On Thu, Jan 19, 2017 at 1:39 PM Douglas Gregor via swift-evolution < [email protected]> wrote:
> Hello Swift community, > > The review of SE-0148 “Generic Subscripts" begins now and runs through > January 24, 2017. The proposal is available here: > > > https://github.com/apple/swift-evolution/blob/master/proposals/0148-generic-subscripts.md > <https://github.com/apple/swift-evolution/blob/master/proposals/NNNN-proposal.md> > > Reviews are an important part of the Swift evolution process. All reviews > should be sent to the swift-evolution mailing list at > > https://lists.swift.org/mailman/listinfo/swift-evolution > > or, if you would like to keep your feedback private, directly to the > review manager. When replying, please try to keep the proposal link at the > top of the message: > > Proposal link: > > > https://github.com/apple/swift-evolution/blob/master/proposals/0148-generic-subscripts.md > <https://github.com/apple/swift-evolution/blob/master/proposals/NNNN-proposal.md> > > Reply text > > Other replies > > <https://github.com/apple/swift-evolution#what-goes-into-a-review-1>What > goes into a review? > > The goal of the review process is to improve the proposal under review > through constructive criticism and, eventually, determine the direction of > Swift. When writing your review, here are some questions you might want to > answer in your review: > > - What is your evaluation of the proposal? > > Big +1. The proposal is short and sweet because it's obvious that we should have this. Just look at that low bug number! :) > > - Is the problem being addressed significant enough to warrant a > change to Swift? > > Absolutely. This is an important part of generics (as well as just for collection types in general) and will make a lot of things cleanly possible that currently aren't. > > - Does this proposal fit well with the feel and direction of Swift? > > Yes. > > - If you have used other languages or libraries with a similar > feature, how do you feel that this proposal compares to those? > > The closest I can think of is having an operator[] overload in C++ that is template-based. It makes sense to have the same functionality in Swift. > > - How much effort did you put into your review? A glance, a quick > reading, or an in-depth study? > > Quick read of the proposal, followed the mailing list threads. > More information about the Swift evolution process is available at > > https://github.com/apple/swift-evolution/blob/master/process.md > > Thank you, > > -Doug > > Review Manager > _______________________________________________ > swift-evolution mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.swift.org/mailman/listinfo/swift-evolution >
_______________________________________________ swift-evolution mailing list [email protected] https://lists.swift.org/mailman/listinfo/swift-evolution
