> On Jan 20, 2017, at 00:09, David Sweeris via swift-evolution > <[email protected]> wrote: > > >> On Jan 19, 2017, at 23:26, Xiaodi Wu <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> Hmm, I don't recall the earlier discussion, > It was a *long* time ago. I'll see if I can find it. If I'm misremembering, > then... > >> but IMO, Charlie's proposal is pretty sensible. Seems backwards to adding >> much broader things like default argument support for protocols motivated by >> a use case that should Just Work(TM). > Agreed, if it can be made to work.
Well I found the thread I was thinking of (https://lists.swift.org/pipermail/swift-evolution/Week-of-Mon-20160111/006795.html and https://lists.swift.org/pipermail/swift-evolution/Week-of-Mon-20160111/006798.html), and glancing over it, I was wrong. So... never mind about my reply to Charlie. - Dave Sweeris
_______________________________________________ swift-evolution mailing list [email protected] https://lists.swift.org/mailman/listinfo/swift-evolution
