> Am 21.01.2017 um 21:31 schrieb Dave Abrahams via swift-evolution
> <[email protected]>:
>
>> I'm struggling a little with the naming and syntax, but as a general
>> approach, I think we want people to use something more like this:
>>
>> if StringOptions(case: .insensitive, locale: .current).compare(foo < bar)
>> { … }
>
> Yeah, we can't do that without making
>
> let a = foo < bar
>
> ambiguous
>
Hi,
the most swifty way to write this I can imagine is something like:
func <(_ a: Int, _ b: Int, case: Case = .insensitive, locale: Locale =
.current)
let a = foo < bar where <(case: .insensitive, locale: .current)
In other words, function or operator calls can be splitted:
func foo(_ a: Int, _ b: Int, option: Option)
let res = foo(10, 20) where foo(option: .fast)
And where it is unambiguous the second function or operator name can be omitted:
let a = foo < bar where (case: .insensitive, locale: .current)
...or shared:
let a = foo1 < bar1 && foo2 < bar2 where (case: .insensitive, locale:
.current)
— Bernd_______________________________________________
swift-evolution mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.swift.org/mailman/listinfo/swift-evolution
