> > Right. The standard approach we take in Swift has been to start with > something baked into the language, then generalize it out to the stdlib over > time if there is a reason to. I’d love to see the various magic around > Optional be accessible to other types, for example. > > -Chris >
+1. I love how Swift takes this approach. I would love to see Optional sugar expanded such that types like Result, for example, could take advantage of it. _______________________________________________ swift-evolution mailing list [email protected] https://lists.swift.org/mailman/listinfo/swift-evolution
