>> protocol LinearOperations {
>> associatedtype StorageType
>> static func dot(_ lhs:Tensor<StorageType>, _
>> rhs:Tensor<StorageType>) -> Tensor<StorageType>
>> ...
>> }
>>
>> extension Tensor: LinearOperations {
>> ...
>> }
>>
>> extension Tensor: LinearOperations where StorageType:CBlasStorage<Float> {
>> ...
>> }
>>
> I’m assuming that both of these extensions implement the static func
> dot(_:_:). This is more interesting direction for me, because it’s taking the
> existing notion of customization points via protocol requirements and
> extending that to also support some level of customization.
Exactly (sorry, I should've made that explicit). I'd be super happy if
this functionality got added to Swift.
Abe
_______________________________________________
swift-evolution mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.swift.org/mailman/listinfo/swift-evolution
