> "Splatting" as the OP suggests is a simpler solution, but leaves variadics > limited to a unique syntax with no control over type;
I also your prefer the proposal than my initial suggestion. > I could of course be biased, but then I've never really supported variadics > as a feature in the first place š To be perfectly honest, Iām not the biggest zealot of variadics neither =D However, I spend most of my time writing libraries for people unfamiliar with programming, or even computer science in general. As a result, I often provide them with "domain specific languagesā embedded in some host language. Swift fits that job extremely well, thanks to many of its features; variadics are one of them. _______________________________________________ swift-evolution mailing list [email protected] https://lists.swift.org/mailman/listinfo/swift-evolution
