> On Feb 17, 2017, at 12:20 AM, Adrian Zubarev via swift-evolution > <[email protected]> wrote: > > I’d like to revive an additive proposal that couldn’t make it into Swift 3. > This proposal has a small improvement to the language compared to other big > features currently being proposed. It almost feels like a bug fix rather than > a new feature, but it still needs a full and quick review process. > > You can read the formatted version here: > https://github.com/apple/swift-evolution/pull/608 > <https://github.com/apple/swift-evolution/pull/608> Just MHO, but I consider this syntactic sugar, not a fundamental feature that fits the goal of Swift 4 stage 2.
I’m also pretty opposed to doing it at any time. The rationale of “implicit return” in closures is specifically because they are limited to a single expression, which makes the semantics “obvious”. This was carefully considered. -Chris
_______________________________________________ swift-evolution mailing list [email protected] https://lists.swift.org/mailman/listinfo/swift-evolution
