On Fri, Feb 17, 2017, at 08:45 PM, Joe Groff via swift-evolution wrote: > • What is your evaluation of the proposal?
Extremely strong +1. Unlike others, I agree with the proposed deprecation of BitwiseOperations. It's not pulling its own weight under this new model. I encourage other reviewers to try, as the proposal suggests, to come up with a compelling user of just BitwiseOperations. > • Is the problem being addressed significant enough to warrant a > change to Swift? Yes; it's not as easy to work with integers in Swift 3 as floating point, which is annoying, since integers are important to binary programming. > • Does this proposal fit well with the feel and direction of Swift? The graph of methods and protocols is well-considered, and while it's probably not mathematically perfect, I could easily see the API being used to teach binary arithmetic. > • If you have used other languages or libraries with a similar > feature, how do you feel that this proposal compares to those? I've tried (and failed) to use Swift's previous protocols for generic programming. > • How much effort did you put into your review? A glance, a quick > reading, or an in-depth study? Thorough reading of previous revisions, glance through of this one. Thanks for providing the updates section! Sincerely, Zachary Waldowski [email protected]
_______________________________________________ swift-evolution mailing list [email protected] https://lists.swift.org/mailman/listinfo/swift-evolution
