> On Feb 25, 2017, at 8:28 AM, Xiaodi Wu via swift-evolution > <[email protected]> wrote: > > I assume that Number being renamed Numeric implies SignedNumber being renamed > SignedNumeric? That is correct.
> On Sat, Feb 25, 2017 at 09:06 Ben Rimmington via swift-evolution > <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: > <https://github.com/apple/swift-evolution/blob/master/proposals/0104-improved-integers.md > > <https://github.com/apple/swift-evolution/blob/master/proposals/0104-improved-integers.md>> > > > On 24 Feb 2017, at 02:05, Ben Cohen wrote: > > > > Regarding the “Number” protocol: it was felt this is likely to cause > > confusion with NSNumber, given the NS-prefix-dropping versions of other > > Foundation types indicate a value-typed concrete type equivalent, which > > this won’t be. The recommendation is to use “Numeric" instead. > > Does the `Error` protocol cause confusion with the `NSError` class? > > I think `Number` is better than `Numeric`, because it is consistent with > `SignedNumber`. > _______________________________________________ > swift-evolution mailing list > [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> > https://lists.swift.org/mailman/listinfo/swift-evolution > <https://lists.swift.org/mailman/listinfo/swift-evolution> > _______________________________________________ > swift-evolution mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.swift.org/mailman/listinfo/swift-evolution
_______________________________________________ swift-evolution mailing list [email protected] https://lists.swift.org/mailman/listinfo/swift-evolution
