> On Feb 27, 2017, at 4:34 PM, Rex Fenley via swift-evolution > <[email protected]> wrote: > > I often find myself running into situations where I'll receive "Ambiguous use > of..." for overloaded functions or operators. In every case these situations > would be easily solved if I could specify "Generic != CertainType" in the > where clause of one of the overloads so I can disambiguate the cases. Could > this be added to language?
Do you have a concrete example where you need this? It'd be good to know whether the types are ambiguous due to type checker bugs, or whether there's a principle by which they could be naturally ordered. Instead of overloading, can you do the type test via `if !(x is CertainType)` within a single implementation? -Joe _______________________________________________ swift-evolution mailing list [email protected] https://lists.swift.org/mailman/listinfo/swift-evolution
