Sent from my iPhone
> On Mar 19, 2017, at 4:53 PM, Matthew Johnson via swift-evolution > <swift-evolution@swift.org> wrote: > > > > Sent from my iPhone > >> On Mar 19, 2017, at 3:45 PM, Brent Royal-Gordon via swift-evolution >> <swift-evolution@swift.org> wrote: >> >>>> On Mar 19, 2017, at 12:57 PM, Charles Srstka via swift-evolution >>>> <swift-evolution@swift.org> wrote: >>>> >>>> I disagree. How the reader is supposed to now there is a static property >>>> or not ? Having readable code is more important than having easy to write >>>> code. >>> >>> I’ve got to agree with this. With the proposed syntax, it’s unclear whether >>> you’re referring to a static property or a key path. It’s going to cause >>> confusion. There needs to be some kind of syntactic way to differentiate >>> the two. >> >> How often do you have a property with the exact same name and type on both >> the instance and type? When you *do* have one, how often would it be better >> off with a name like `defaultFoo` instead of plain `foo`? >> That crossed my mind too. If we have a static property with the same name as a property then make it a warning and we can easily rename one or the other in our code to fix the warning. >> Why is this a problem for keypaths, but not for unbound methods? >> Hi Brent, what is an unbound method? Do you have a simple example just so that I can better follow what you are saying? Thanks. >> How is this different from a hundred other places in Swift where we allow >> overloading and tolerate ambiguity in order to enjoy nicer syntax? >> >> When, in practice, do you expect this to cause trouble? > > +1 > >> >> -- >> Brent Royal-Gordon >> Architechies >> >> _______________________________________________ >> swift-evolution mailing list >> swift-evolution@swift.org >> https://lists.swift.org/mailman/listinfo/swift-evolution > _______________________________________________ > swift-evolution mailing list > swift-evolution@swift.org > https://lists.swift.org/mailman/listinfo/swift-evolution
_______________________________________________ swift-evolution mailing list swift-evolution@swift.org https://lists.swift.org/mailman/listinfo/swift-evolution