> On Mar 20, 2017, at 4:54 PM, Douglas Gregor via swift-evolution > <swift-evolution@swift.org> wrote: > > Proposal link: > >> https://github.com/apple/swift-evolution/blob/master/proposals/0159-fix-private-access-levels.md > > • What is your evaluation of the proposal?
I'm torn. During the SE-0025 review, I argued against scoped private. I still think it was a mistake to add it. But we did, it's out there, and I don't want to introduce churn unnecessarily. Long ago, judges realized the problems caused by re-litigating old disputes and created a doctrine called "stare decisis": standing by things decided. That doesn't mean they won't correct obvious mistakes, but it does mean that they default to upholding the precedent they've already set. I think that would be a wise course here. I personally would prefer to have Swift behave as SE-0159 proposes. But if the core team thinks this is going to come out 50/50—that is, this change will help about as many people as it hurts—I think they should reject this proposal and keep the status quo. I really don't want to write another review next year for SE-0289 "Reintroduce Scoped Private". -- Brent Royal-Gordon Architechies _______________________________________________ swift-evolution mailing list swift-evolution@swift.org https://lists.swift.org/mailman/listinfo/swift-evolution
