> On Mar 23, 2017, at 2:22 AM, Matt Gallagher via swift-evolution > <[email protected]> wrote: > I can't help but feel that this proposal is really misdirected frustration. > Programmers who don't use clusters of tiny types in a single file shouldn't > care about the existence of a scoped access modifier because it shouldn't > affect them – they should use file access modifiers and be done. Yet > apparently, it is file access modifier advocates pushing this proposal.
It is equally frustrating that those on the opposite side of this proposal keep indicating “just don’t pay attention to it” is an acceptable answer to the language growing an entire axis of confusion to its access control (i.e., a wart) so early in its life. Sincerely, Zachary Waldowski Sent from my Mac
_______________________________________________ swift-evolution mailing list [email protected] https://lists.swift.org/mailman/listinfo/swift-evolution
