Fantastic. Great to hear. I look forward to reading the revised proposal! Regards
> On 24 Mar 2017, at 3:34 am, Itai Ferber <[email protected]> wrote: > > Hi Oliver, > > Thanks for your comments! We thought about this and we agree overall — we > will incorporate this suggestion along with others in the next batch update > as long as nothing prohibitive comes up. > > — Itai > > On 23 Mar 2017, at 7:49, Oliver Jones wrote: > > Like everyone I’m excited by this new proposal. But… > > > protocol Codable: Adopted by types to opt into archival. Conformance may be > > automatically derived in cases where all properties are also Codable. > > … can I make one suggestion. Please do not repeat the mistakes of NSCoding > in combining the encoding and decoding into a single protocol. Just as there > are Encoder and Decoder classes their should be Encodable and Decodable > protocols (maybe have an aggregate Codable protocol for convenience but do > not force it).
_______________________________________________ swift-evolution mailing list [email protected] https://lists.swift.org/mailman/listinfo/swift-evolution
