On Thu, Apr 6, 2017 at 12:05 AM, Douglas Gregor via swift-evolution < [email protected]> wrote:
> > - What is your evaluation of the proposal? > > +1 This small inconsistency can lead to pretty hard debugging session. I think the protocols will still need some extra work because, as Howard Lovatt said, people get confused about which method will be called when methods of a type conflict with methods in a protocol extension. But this is a good small step towards a more consistent model, so it seems good to me. > - Is the problem being addressed significant enough to warrant a > change to Swift? > > Yes > - Does this proposal fit well with the feel and direction of Swift? > > Yes > > - If you have used other languages or libraries with a similar > feature, how do you feel that this proposal compares to those? > > N/A > - How much effort did you put into your review? A glance, a quick > reading, or an in-depth study? > > Quick reading. -- Víctor Pimentel
_______________________________________________ swift-evolution mailing list [email protected] https://lists.swift.org/mailman/listinfo/swift-evolution
