Another thought on the use of single quotes (an possibly the proposed escape character). Do you think the closing single quote could be made optional since key paths cannot have spaces? Or would that be confusing for beginners?
For example, these two would be equivalent: let isPuppyPredicate = 'Pet.type == .dog && 'Pet.age < 12 let isPuppyPredicate = 'Pet.type' == .dog && 'Pet.age' < 12 Or this: let isPuppyPredicate = \Pet.type == .dog && \Pet.age < 12 let isPuppyPredicate = \Pet.type\ == .dog && \Pet.age\ < 12 You would use the closing character normally when wanting to invoke a method on the key path object. Any thoughts? > On Apr 6, 2017, at 11:13 AM, Ricardo Parada via swift-evolution > <swift-evolution@swift.org> wrote: > > I agree, there's an analogy between strings and key paths, and in that > regards the single quote would make sense. I would not complain. > > >> On Apr 6, 2017, at 11:08 AM, Sean Heber via swift-evolution >> <swift-evolution@swift.org> wrote: >> >>>> That's an interesting point. While `\` alone seems acceptable, I think >>>> it's unfortunate that we'll have `(\...)` and `\(...)` both in the >>>> language. >>>> Can we maybe consider instead: >>>> >>>> let firstFriendsNameKeyPath = \Person.friends[0].name\ >>> >>> 'Single quotes' (i.e. U+0027 APOSTROPHE) are available AFAIK: >>> >>> // Create a key path and use it >>> let firstFriendsNameKeyPath = 'Person.friends[0].name' >>> luke[keyPath: firstFriendsNameKeyPath] // "Han Solo" >>> >>> // or equivalently, with type inferred from context >>> luke[keyPath: '.friends[0].name'] // "Han Solo" >>> >>> // [SE-0042][SR-3550] Unapplied method references >>> 'String.lowercased()' // (String) -> String >>> 'String.lowercased(with:)' // (String, Locale?) -> String >>> >>> Unlike the Lisp-style backtick, an apostrophe would appear on *both* ends >>> of the key path (or method reference). >> >> For what it’s worth, I much rather prefer this approach and was going to >> suggest it today. In Objective-C, keypaths were just strings so by using a >> single tick, they still look *almost* like strings, but now they’re safe and >> checked by the compiler - magical. >> >> l8r >> Sean >> >> _______________________________________________ >> swift-evolution mailing list >> swift-evolution@swift.org >> https://lists.swift.org/mailman/listinfo/swift-evolution > > _______________________________________________ > swift-evolution mailing list > swift-evolution@swift.org > https://lists.swift.org/mailman/listinfo/swift-evolution
_______________________________________________ swift-evolution mailing list swift-evolution@swift.org https://lists.swift.org/mailman/listinfo/swift-evolution
