> On Apr 7, 2017, at 3:51 AM, Goffredo Marocchi <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>
>
> Sent from my iPhone
>
> On 7 Apr 2017, at 09:56, Jonathan Hull via swift-evolution
> <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
>
>>> What is your evaluation of the proposal?
>>
>> Strong -1. Just rename ‘fileprivate’ to be less annoying.
>
> So, we keep being told it won't happen and our current Bly suggestion
> discussing this proposal cannot be to just keep asking for it, can it?
We were told we can’t do the double rename. I believe renaming ‘fileprivate’
is still on the table (or at least it will have to be at some point when we
consider submodules).
If renaming ‘fileprivate’ is truly off the table, we should definitely NOT
accept this proposal (for all the reasons I and others have stated). We should
keep the status quo, horrible as it may be.
_______________________________________________
swift-evolution mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.swift.org/mailman/listinfo/swift-evolution
