> On Apr 12, 2017, at 11:49 AM, Russ Bishop <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> Doug,
>
> Would it be worth deferring this slightly since it relies on SE-0166? If
> changes are made to SE-0166 as a result of review it will necessarily impact
> this proposal.
If there are changes to SE-0166 that affect this, we can always hold off on a
decision to make more adjustments. I don’t think we need to stagger the review
of two closely-related proposals like this.
- Doug
>
>
> Russ Bishop
>
>
>> On Apr 6, 2017, at 11:10 AM, Douglas Gregor via swift-evolution
>> <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
>>
>> Hello Swift community,
>>
>> The review of SE-0167 "Swift Encoders" begins now and runs through April 12,
>> 2017. The proposal is available here:
>>
>> https://github.com/apple/swift-evolution/blob/master/proposals/0167-swift-encoders.md
>>
>> <https://github.com/apple/swift-evolution/blob/master/proposals/0167-swift-encoders.md>
>> Note that this proposal is closely related to (and dependent on) SE-0166:
>> Swift Archival & Serialization
>> <https://github.com/apple/swift-evolution/blob/master/proposals/0166-swift-archival-serialization.md>.
>> Please read and review that proposal as well!
>>
>> Reviews are an important part of the Swift evolution process. All reviews
>> should be sent to the swift-evolution mailing list at
>>
>> https://lists.swift.org/mailman/listinfo/swift-evolution
>> <https://lists.swift.org/mailman/listinfo/swift-evolution>
>> or, if you would like to keep your feedback private, directly to the review
>> manager. When replying, please try to keep the proposal link at the top of
>> the message:
>>
>> Proposal link:
>>
>> https://github.com/apple/swift-evolution/blob/master/proposals/0167-swift-encoders.md
>>
>> <https://github.com/apple/swift-evolution/blob/master/proposals/0167-swift-encoders.md>
>> Reply text
>> Other replies
>>
>> <https://github.com/apple/swift-evolution/blob/master/process.md#what-goes-into-a-review-1>What
>> goes into a review?
>>
>> The goal of the review process is to improve the proposal under review
>> through constructive criticism and, eventually, determine the direction of
>> Swift. When writing your review, here are some questions you might want to
>> answer in your review:
>>
>> What is your evaluation of the proposal?
>> Is the problem being addressed significant enough to warrant a change to
>> Swift?
>> Does this proposal fit well with the feel and direction of Swift?
>> If you have used other languages or libraries with a similar feature, how do
>> you feel that this proposal compares to those?
>> How much effort did you put into your review? A glance, a quick reading, or
>> an in-depth study?
>> More information about the Swift evolution process is available at
>>
>> https://github.com/apple/swift-evolution/blob/master/process.md
>> <https://github.com/apple/swift-evolution/blob/master/process.md>
>> Thank you,
>>
>> -Doug
>>
>> Review Manager
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> swift-evolution mailing list
>> [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
>> https://lists.swift.org/mailman/listinfo/swift-evolution
>> <https://lists.swift.org/mailman/listinfo/swift-evolution>
_______________________________________________
swift-evolution mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.swift.org/mailman/listinfo/swift-evolution
