> On Jun 2, 2017, at 3:56 AM, Jaden Geller <jaden.gel...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Why would this not be possible with fixed sized arrays? Theoretically you > could create a type that wrapped a fixed array and make it conform to > whatever protocol you want, including the “ExpressibleBy” protocols.
I DO want it to be possible with future fixed-sized arrays. This is not a user-side question, but implementor-side. I’m asking if the parsing routines for it would conflict with the current array- and dictionary-literal rules, since they will co-exist. If this syntax would make determining whether we have an enhanced array literal or a dictionary literal too hard, then we should change it before anything is finalized. — Daryle Walker Mac, Internet, and Video Game Junkie darylew AT mac DOT com _______________________________________________ swift-evolution mailing list swift-evolution@swift.org https://lists.swift.org/mailman/listinfo/swift-evolution