> On Jun 2, 2017, at 3:56 AM, Jaden Geller <jaden.gel...@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> Why would this not be possible with fixed sized arrays? Theoretically you 
> could create a type that wrapped a fixed array and make it conform to 
> whatever protocol you want, including the “ExpressibleBy” protocols.

I DO want it to be possible with future fixed-sized arrays. This is not a 
user-side question, but implementor-side. I’m asking if the parsing routines 
for it would conflict with the current array- and dictionary-literal rules, 
since they will co-exist. If this syntax would make determining whether we have 
an enhanced array literal or a dictionary literal too hard, then we should 
change it before anything is finalized.

— 
Daryle Walker
Mac, Internet, and Video Game Junkie
darylew AT mac DOT com 

_______________________________________________
swift-evolution mailing list
swift-evolution@swift.org
https://lists.swift.org/mailman/listinfo/swift-evolution

Reply via email to