On Fri, Jun 2, 2017 at 1:53 AM, Jonathan Hull via swift-evolution < swift-evolution@swift.org> wrote:
> I vote to revert it to current behavior. Then we can take time to come up > with the correct answer for future Swift. > > If we don’t revert and then end up changing it again later, we will break > everybody’s code twice... > > Thanks, > Jon > +1 This source-breaking change affects lots of libraries, as it has been shown. It seems very late in Swift 4 to be discussing alternative syntaxes, so the best action for me would be revert it and revisit this in the next version. -- Víctor Pimentel
_______________________________________________ swift-evolution mailing list swift-evolution@swift.org https://lists.swift.org/mailman/listinfo/swift-evolution
