On Tue, Jun 6, 2017 at 7:18 AM Gwendal Roué via swift-evolution <
swift-evolution@swift.org> wrote:

>
> Le 6 juin 2017 à 15:30, Vladimir.S <sva...@gmail.com> a écrit :
>
> I'm just trying to understand your opinion.
> Let me know, what result do you *expect* for this Swift4 code given what
> SE-0066 requires for function types:
>
> func foo(x : (Int, Int))->() {}
>
> print(type(of: foo))  // ??
> print(foo is (_: Int, _: Int)->())  // ??
>
>
> I couldn't care less.
>
> What I care about: the code regressions introduced by SE-0110 (look at
> previous messages in this long thread, and the ridiculous state of closures
> that eat tuples), and the migration bugs (look at Xcode 9 release notes).
>

Note that many of Apple's swift team are likely swamped with WWDC at the
moment. They are also dealing with merging out their private changes
announced so far at WWDC. Xcode 9 is prerelease still so expect things to
get revised to some degree before the final release.

Not say to not voice concerns but at this time some patience will be needed.

-Shawn

>
_______________________________________________
swift-evolution mailing list
swift-evolution@swift.org
https://lists.swift.org/mailman/listinfo/swift-evolution

Reply via email to