On 22 June 2017 at 02:46, Jon Shier <[email protected]> wrote: 1 can already be accomplished by moving the custom initializer into an > extension. >
it can indeed. although if you need to create an extension just for this purpose it feels like a workaround, takes more lines and is less obvious, imho. plus if #3 is accepted (the same construct for classes) it would be more consistent to have it in structs as well. Mike
_______________________________________________ swift-evolution mailing list [email protected] https://lists.swift.org/mailman/listinfo/swift-evolution
