> On Jun 27, 2017, at 2:49 PM, David Hart via swift-evolution 
> <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> 
>> On 27 Jun 2017, at 20:23, Dave DeLong via swift-evolution 
>> <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
>> 
>> Also a +1 from me. This is something I always put in to my code.
>> 
>> I agree that having `Never` as a bottom type is interesting, but even if 
>> that were the case, the proposed “!!” operator is still useful, because it 
>> short-circuits having to fatalError() myself. IE:
>> 
>> let last = array.last ?? fatalError(“array must not be empty”)
> 
> The above solution with Never is the better solution IMHO:
> 
> No new operator
> More flexible: what if you want something else than a fatalError? For 
> example, I might want to define a logAndFatalError() function which stores 
> the error to a log file before trapping.

+1

> 
>> vs
>> 
>> let last = array.last !! “Array must not be empty"
>> 
>> I also think having it “fatalError” in shipping code is fine, because it’s 
>> equivalent to what would happen if you incorrect force-unwrap.
>> 
>> Dave
>> 
>>> On Jun 27, 2017, at 12:08 PM, Zach Waldowski via swift-evolution 
>>> <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
>>> 
>>> Big +1.
>>> 
>>> Using `!` is widely seen as a smell. However, the need for it still arises; 
>>> they are preconditions, of a sort. It has become prevalent in my teams’ 
>>> codebases to do “guard else preconditionFailure”.
>>> 
>>> I like `!!` over something like `?!`; it follows the pattern that almost 
>>> every `?` in the language has an equivalent `!`.
>>> 
>>> The implementation details are ultimately not relevant to me. I’m a fan of 
>>> `Never` being a bottom type for more reasons than just this. I also see no 
>>> reason why operator funcs couldn’t accept file and line as extra arguments 
>>> on the rhs.
>>> 
>>> Best,
>>>   Zachary Waldowski
>>>   [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
>>> 
>>> On Tue, Jun 27, 2017, at 01:16 PM, Erica Sadun via swift-evolution wrote:
>>>> Using an operator to provide feedback on the context of a failed unwrap 
>>>> has become a commonly implemented approach in the Swift developer 
>>>> Community. What are your thoughts about adopting this widely-used operator 
>>>> into the standard library?
>>>> 
>>>> guard !lastItem.isEmpty else { return }
>>>> let lastItem = array.last !! "Array must be non-empty"
>>>> 
>>>> Details here:  
>>>> https://gist.github.com/erica/423e4b1c63b95c4c90338cdff4939a9b 
>>>> <https://gist.github.com/erica/423e4b1c63b95c4c90338cdff4939a9b>
>>>> 
>>>> Thank you for your thoughtful feedback, -- E
>>>> 
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> swift-evolution mailing list
>>>> [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
>>>> https://lists.swift.org/mailman/listinfo/swift-evolution 
>>>> <https://lists.swift.org/mailman/listinfo/swift-evolution>
>>> 
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> swift-evolution mailing list
>>> [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
>>> https://lists.swift.org/mailman/listinfo/swift-evolution 
>>> <https://lists.swift.org/mailman/listinfo/swift-evolution>
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> swift-evolution mailing list
>> [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
>> https://lists.swift.org/mailman/listinfo/swift-evolution
> 
> _______________________________________________
> swift-evolution mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.swift.org/mailman/listinfo/swift-evolution

_______________________________________________
swift-evolution mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.swift.org/mailman/listinfo/swift-evolution

Reply via email to