+1 This seems great to me.  It seems worth calling out how escaping of 
backslashes and escaping of newlines interact for testing:


        let s = """
        line fragment ending in backslash \\\
        and
        line fragment ending in backslash \\\
        \\followed by line fragment starting with backslash
        """

I would expect to get "line fragment ending in backslash \\and\nline fragment 
ending in backslash\\\\followed by line fragment starting with backslash”, that 
is, escaped backslashes at the end of line fragments should be retained, and 
whatever concatenates line fragments shouldn’t accidentally double-interpret 
backslashes.

Alternatively:

        let s = """
        line ending in backslash \\
        and
        line ending in backslash \\
        \\followed by line starting with backslash
        """

seems like it should produce the result "line ending in backslash \\\nand\nline 
ending in backslash\\\n\\followed by line starting with backslash”, that is, 
the consumption of escaped backslashes should happen before considering if 
there is an extra backslash on the end of the line for an escaped newline.

-tim



> On Jul 12, 2017, at 3:52 PM, Chris Lattner via swift-evolution 
> <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> Hello Swift community,
> 
> Context: As part of winding down work on Swift 4, we are considering SE-0182 
> as a refinement to SE-0168.  We are specifically not opening the floodgates 
> for new proposals just yet, and it is not considered in scope to resyntax all 
> of multi-line string literals.  We’re just discussing this one potential 
> small-scope refinement to an existing Swift 4 feature.
> 
> 
> The review of "String Newline Escaping" begins now and runs through July 17, 
> 2017. The proposal is available here:
> https://github.com/apple/swift-evolution/blob/master/proposals/0182-newline-escape-in-strings.md
> 
> Reviews are an important part of the Swift evolution process. All reviews 
> should be sent to the swift-evolution mailing list at
> https://lists.swift.org/mailman/listinfo/swift-evolution
> 
> or, if you would like to keep your feedback private, directly to the review 
> manager. When replying, please try to keep the proposal link at the top of 
> the message:
> 
> What goes into a review?
> 
> The goal of the review process is to improve the proposal under review 
> through constructive criticism and, eventually, determine the direction of 
> Swift. When writing your review, here are some questions you might want to 
> answer in your review:
> 
>       • What is your evaluation of the proposal?
>       • Is the problem being addressed significant enough to warrant a change 
> to Swift?
>       • Does this proposal fit well with the feel and direction of Swift?
>       • If you have used other languages or libraries with a similar feature, 
> how do you feel that this proposal compares to those?
>       • How much effort did you put into your review? A glance, a quick 
> reading, or an in-depth study?
> 
> More information about the Swift evolution process is available at:
> https://github.com/apple/swift-evolution/blob/master/process.md
> 
> 
> Thank you,
> 
> Chris Lattner
> Review Manager
> _______________________________________________
> swift-evolution mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.swift.org/mailman/listinfo/swift-evolution

_______________________________________________
swift-evolution mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.swift.org/mailman/listinfo/swift-evolution

Reply via email to