> On Jul 26, 2017, at 12:36 AM, Daryle Walker via swift-evolution > <swift-evolution@swift.org> wrote: > [Sorry if this's been discussed before.] > > As long as the superclass sub-object gets initialized, it shouldn't matter if > the initializer was designated or convenience. Is there some subtle step on > the two-phase initialization I'm missing? Or is this a point to extend in a > future version of Swift?
Convenience initializers are complete-object initializers. A sub-object initializer from a subclass cannot delegate to a complete-object initializer from its superclass because that would re-initialize all the subclass sub-objects. John. _______________________________________________ swift-evolution mailing list swift-evolution@swift.org https://lists.swift.org/mailman/listinfo/swift-evolution
