> On Sep 13, 2017, at 4:21 AM, Gwendal Roué via swift-evolution
> <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>>> If I take on my free time exposing issues, it's because I hope that maybe
>>> some reader will consider them with proper attention, then maybe agree that
>>> there is an issue worth investigating, and then many conclude that a made
>>> decision has to be reverted. That's a multi-step process. And that process
>>> starts with a proper read of the issues that have been exposed.
>>
>> Keep in mind that by posting to this list, you are also demanding other
>> people spend their free time on the issue. And again, these issues have
>> already been discussed. If a point is made once but doesn't carry the day,
>> repeating it again and again doesn't make it more convincing.
>
> The fact that you fail at evaluating the relevance of an issue, as
> exemplified by the fact that you never answer directly to the described
> problems, does not make that issue moot. Instead, it may well end in the ears
> of people who have been more engaged in the subject: Tony Allevato as the
> author of SE-0185, and Chris Lattner the review manager.
The posts in this thread have grown a bit nasty and personal. Before we reach
the level of CoC violations over a single keyword, can we all take a deep
breath and try to approach this more cordially?
("Gentlemen, you can't fight in here! This is the War Room!")
--
Brent Royal-Gordon
Architechies
_______________________________________________
swift-evolution mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.swift.org/mailman/listinfo/swift-evolution
