On Fri, Sep 29, 2017 at 4:13 PM, Andrew Trick <atr...@apple.com> wrote:
> > > On Sep 29, 2017, at 1:23 PM, Taylor Swift <kelvin1...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Instead of >> >> buf.intialize(at: i, from: source) >> >> We want to force a more obvious idiom: >> >> buf[i..<n].intialize(from: source) >> >> > The problem with subscript notation is we currently get the n argument > from the source argument. So what would really have to be written is > > buf[i ..< i + source.count].initialize(from: source) > > which is a lot more ugly and redundant. One option could be to decouple > the count parameter from the length of the source buffer, but that opens up > the whole can of worms in which length do we use? What happens if n - i is > less than or longer than source.count? If we enforce the precondition that > source.count == n - i, then this syntax seems horribly redundant. > > > Sorry, a better analogy would have been: > > buf[i...].intialize(from: source) > > Whether you specify the slice’s end point depends on whether you want to > completely initialize that slice or whether you’re just filling up as much > of the buffer as you can. It also depends on whether `source` is also a > buffer (of known size) or some arbitrary Sequence. > > Otherwise, point taken. > > -Andy > After thinking about this more, one-sided ranges might provide just the expressivity we need. What if: buf[offset...].initialize(from: source) // initializes source.count elements from source starting from offset buf[offset ..< endIndex].initialize(from: source) // initializes up to source.count elements from source starting from offset The one sided one does not give a full initialization guarantee. The two sided one guarantees the entire segment is initialized. For move operations, the one sided one will fully deinitialize the source buffer while the two sided one will only deinitialize endIndex - offset elements.
_______________________________________________ swift-evolution mailing list swift-evolution@swift.org https://lists.swift.org/mailman/listinfo/swift-evolution