> On Nov 28, 2017, at 1:55 PM, Ben Rimmington <m...@benrimmington.com> wrote: > > I suggest using different subscripts for function/method calls and properties: > > * `value(...)` ==> `value[dynamicFunction: ""](...)` > * `value.name(...)` ==> `value[dynamicFunction: "name"](...)` > * `value.name` ==> `value[dynamicProperty: "name"]` > > Dynamic callable types have an unnamed method. > Dynamic argument labels are always allowed (but can be ignored). > For example, the labels of `Date.UTC` below are not passed to JavaScript.
Hi Ben, This proposal has nothing to do with “callables”, just dynamics member lookup. The other proposal: https://gist.github.com/lattner/a6257f425f55fe39fd6ac7a2354d693d <https://gist.github.com/lattner/a6257f425f55fe39fd6ac7a2354d693d> (which I need to revise a bit) relates to dynamic callable stuff, and it does in fact have a “DynamicCallableWithKeywordsToo” form that provides what you are asking for IIUC. There is no need to model calls as subscripts though, because syntactic calls in swift (intentionally) do not produce lvalues. -Chris
_______________________________________________ swift-evolution mailing list swift-evolution@swift.org https://lists.swift.org/mailman/listinfo/swift-evolution
