On Sat, Dec 2, 2017 at 2:30 PM, Howard Lovatt via swift-evolution < swift-evolution@swift.org> wrote:
> Definitely in favour of doing something, I always define the associated > types since I have had so much trouble with the inference. > > Personally I would prefer just 1 and 2 and forget 3. I know this would > break a lot of code, but I think we should do that because it is the lesser > of the evils. > As Doug wrote, an approach that's essentially that was reviewed and rejected in SE-0108. We already know that it's not acceptable to a great proportion of the community.
_______________________________________________ swift-evolution mailing list swift-evolution@swift.org https://lists.swift.org/mailman/listinfo/swift-evolution