> On Jan 17, 2018, at 4:19 PM, Jordan Rose <jordan_r...@apple.com> wrote: >>> >>> The parser has fairly general support for declmodifiers, and my proposal >>> fits directly into that. The only extension is that ‘default’ isn’t a >>> decl, and I don’t think we have a statement modifier yet. That said, we’ve >>> always planned to have them when the need arose. >> >> ‘case’ isn’t a decl in switches either. Nor is it a statement, the way >> things are modeled today. > > Bleah, sorry, I forgot that it is a statement at the moment. But I don't > think it needs to be modeled as a statement attribute/modifier. A flag on > CaseStmt is fine.
DeclModifiers are a syntax/parser thing, not a representational concept in the AST. Storing it as a bit would be fine, I’d also prefer that. -Chris
_______________________________________________ swift-evolution mailing list swift-evolution@swift.org https://lists.swift.org/mailman/listinfo/swift-evolution
