At a minimum, this gives me http://swiftstub.com/60017598 <http://swiftstub.com/60017598>
But I remember reading *somewhere* (can't remember) that we were supposed to avoid AnyGenerator/AnySequence and they were on the way out. Am I out of my mind? -- E > On Dec 18, 2015, at 2:47 PM, Jacob Bandes-Storch <jtban...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Oops, of course I meant product<S1: SequenceType, S2: SequenceType>(...) ! > > Jacob > > On Fri, Dec 18, 2015 at 1:45 PM, Jacob Bandes-Storch <jtban...@gmail.com > <mailto:jtban...@gmail.com>> wrote: > 1. Maybe ProductGenerator? > 2. Use AnyGenerator<(T, U)>? > > I'd love to see something like this in stdlib: > > func product<S1, S2>(s1: S1, s2: S2) -> ProductSequence<S1.Generator.Element, > S2.Generator.Element> { > ... > } > > where ProductSequence<T,U>.Generator.Element is (T, U). > > So your example could be "for (x,y) in product(0..<4, 0..<2)". > > Jacob Bandes-Storch > > On Fri, Dec 18, 2015 at 1:22 PM, Erica Sadun via swift-users > <swift-users@swift.org <mailto:swift-users@swift.org>> wrote: > Source: http://swiftstub.com/788132715 <http://swiftstub.com/788132715> > > Two questions: > > 1. Can anyone recommended a better name than Cartesian? 2D doesn't work for > the compiler and I'm looking for something that doesn't seem > "floating-point"-y > 2. Is there a way to internalize the generator and not make it public? I'd > ideally like to hide all details except the fact that this is a sequence of > (Int, Int) > > Thanks > > -- Erica > > > > _______________________________________________ > swift-users mailing list > swift-users@swift.org <mailto:swift-users@swift.org> > https://lists.swift.org/mailman/listinfo/swift-users > <https://lists.swift.org/mailman/listinfo/swift-users> > > >
_______________________________________________ swift-users mailing list swift-users@swift.org https://lists.swift.org/mailman/listinfo/swift-users
