on Tue Jun 28 2016, Jordan Rose <jordan_rose-AT-apple.com> wrote: >> On Jun 27, 2016, at 18:52, Tim Vermeulen <tvermeu...@me.com> wrote: >> >> Thanks for your reply. It didn’t clear up everything, though. The >> official documentation says "Weak references do not affect the >> result of this function.”, which suggests that weak (and unowned) >> references intentionally aren’t counted. The docs only mention the >> implementation of copy-on-write behaviour as a use case (which also >> happens to be what I’m using it for). > > I would expect that weak references are important to count for COW, > since you can observe changes through them. Dave?
I can try to address this thread, but not immediately I'm afraid. I'm just swamped at the moment. Sorry, -- Dave _______________________________________________ swift-users mailing list swift-users@swift.org https://lists.swift.org/mailman/listinfo/swift-users