On 17 Aug 2016, at 18:55, Martin R via swift-users <swift-users@swift.org> wrote:
> - Are both solutions correct, should one be preferred, or are both wrong? Your `withMemoryRebound` solution is correct. > - Can the same be achieved simpler? Not without introducing a layer of abstraction. In my case I introduced an abstract `Address` type (basically a wrapper around `sockaddr_storage`) and then added a method to that object which calls a closure with the right parameters (actually, multiple such methods, depending on whether I’m calling something like `connect` which takes an address, or `getpeername`, which returns one). This approach concentrates all the ugly in one place, making the rest of my BSD Sockets code much cleaner. Share and Enjoy -- Quinn "The Eskimo!" <http://www.apple.com/developer/> Apple Developer Relations, Developer Technical Support, Core OS/Hardware _______________________________________________ swift-users mailing list swift-users@swift.org https://lists.swift.org/mailman/listinfo/swift-users
