`Slice` family of types (there are many) are well documented to share the
indices and inherit the semantics. All collections that have a SubSequence of a
Slice type, share indices. Unfortunately, standard library is not well
documented in general and collection API have undergone big changes in Swift
3.0, so this may not be very clear now.
The problem with `String.CharacterView` is that its SubSequence is not a
Try this out:
let subSeq1 = "abc".characters.prefix(1)
let subSeq2 = Array("abc".characters).prefix(1)
print(type(of:subSeq1)) // prints CharacterView
print(type(of:subSeq2)) // prints ArraySlice<Character>
Converting `String.CharacterView` to Array<Character> is an expensive operation
and will kill the performance of string manipulation, but will work as you
expect, since Array is properly sliced.
> On Oct 13, 2016, at 5:42 PM, Tim Vermeulen <tvermeu...@me.com> wrote:
> Alright. Does this mean that we can otherwise assume that collections share
> indices with their subsequences? It might be worth documenting, one way or
> the other.
>> On 14 Oct 2016, at 02:40, Hooman Mehr <hoo...@mac.com
>> <mailto:hoo...@mac.com>> wrote:
>> This is a bug reported multiple times in different forms. My version of it
>> is: SR-1487 <https://bugs.swift.org/browse/SR-1487>.
>> It remains open because it is not easy to fix with the existing design of
>> String. Apparently core standard library team are working on an overhaul of
>> String to address this and other usability and performance issues.
>>> On Oct 13, 2016, at 5:12 PM, Tim Vermeulen via swift-users
>>> <email@example.com <mailto:firstname.lastname@example.org>> wrote:
>>> Is it a requirement that collections share indices with its subsequence?
>>> Array and ArraySlice do share indices, which is why ArraySlice isn’t
>>> zero-based, and I think this is convenient. But String.CharacterView
>>> doesn’t seem to share indices with its subsequence (which is
>>> String.CharacterView as well). Consider this example:
>>> let foo = "foobar".characters
>>> let index = foo.index(foo.startIndex, offsetBy: 3)
>>> let bar = foo.suffix(from: index) // "bar"
>>> foo[index] // "b" :)
>>> foo[bar.startIndex] // "f" :(
>>> So does this mean that we can’t assume that collections and their
>>> subsequences share their indices (which could be very handy), or is this
>>> just a bug related to String.CharacterView?
>>> swift-users mailing list
>>> email@example.com <mailto:firstname.lastname@example.org>
swift-users mailing list