> On Nov 3, 2016, at 2:06 PM, Erica Sadun via swift-users 
> <swift-users@swift.org> wrote:
> 
> I want less of a monorepo than an ability to build a group of orthogonal 
> elements into a single repo so I don't have to create a separate repo for 
> every single Swift library I build, especially when there are logical 
> relationships between subfolders and partial incorporation into builds  For 
> example, I'm messing with core graphics geometry right now. I have basic 
> types & extensions, some experimental stuff, and other misc things for (for 
> example) doing playground visualization support. Rather than 
> over-conditionalize my code, I'd rather conditionalize the package, so that 
> everything pulls, compiles, and works fine on, say, a macOS build but bits 
> that don't belong (iOS playground visualization support) can be omitted from 
> a specific configuration *for* *that* *repo* instead of me having to make 
> really ugly code conditions in files which are intended specifically for 
> known targets and may be excluded from package builds because of their 
> intended targets.

Can you explain the interaction between conditional compilation and monorepo / 
multi-package repos? They seem somewhat orthogonal to me.

 - Daniel

> -- E
> 
> 
>> On Nov 3, 2016, at 2:31 PM, Ankit Agarwal via swift-users 
>> <swift-users@swift.org <mailto:swift-users@swift.org>> wrote:
>> 
>> +swift-build-dev
>> 
>> Not right now but we're considering adding support for multiple packages in 
>> a repository. It would be good if you can explain your 
>> requirements/features/flow are you looking for.
>> 
>> On Friday 4 November 2016, Georgios Moschovitis via swift-users 
>> <swift-users@swift.org <mailto:swift-users@swift.org>> wrote:
>> The Swift Package Manager is a great addition to the Swift programmer's 
>> toolbelt and in general I like the integration with Git.
>> 
>> However, since SPM promotes a separate Git repo per package and actually 
>> leverages Git tags to resolve dependency versions, I am wondering if it's 
>> possible to use the popular(?) 'monorepo' workflow with SPM. 
>> 
>> thanks,
>> -g.
>> 
>> 
>> -- 
>> Ankit
>> 
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> swift-users mailing list
>> swift-users@swift.org <mailto:swift-users@swift.org>
>> https://lists.swift.org/mailman/listinfo/swift-users
> 
> _______________________________________________
> swift-users mailing list
> swift-users@swift.org
> https://lists.swift.org/mailman/listinfo/swift-users

_______________________________________________
swift-users mailing list
swift-users@swift.org
https://lists.swift.org/mailman/listinfo/swift-users

Reply via email to