Wow, very cool. I'm not going to lie, creduce really does have some magic going on. :)
Thanks everyone, I'll go back to creduce and see how it handles Swift. Doug Hill > On Apr 19, 2017, at 5:21 PM, Huon Wilson <h...@apple.com> wrote: > > No; Swift just looks C-like enough that many of the various heuristics > creduce has still work reasonably efficiently. Unless one's “good or not” > script is doing something weird, the areas where creduce doesn’t understand > Swift are ignored, because the compiler output is not going to match what the > script is checking for. > > The main downside of it not understanding Swift is that it is likely to be > slower than on C, since it’ll be wasting its time on some mutations that will > very very rarely be interesting. > > Huon > >> On Apr 19, 2017, at 17:16, Doug Hill <swiftus...@breaqz.com> wrote: >> >> Ok, that's unexpected. Does creduce know about Swift now? >> >> Doug Hill >> >> >>> On Apr 19, 2017, at 5:13 PM, Slava Pestov <spes...@apple.com> wrote: >>> >>> Huon noticed that creduce actually works pretty well with Swift as-is. I’ve >>> been using it without any issues. >>> >>> Slava >>> >>>> On Apr 19, 2017, at 3:53 PM, Doug Hill via swift-users >>>> <swift-users@swift.org> wrote: >>>> >>>> Is there a version of 'creduce' for Swift? >>>> >>>> I did some basic googling and didn't find anything, so I thought I'd ask >>>> here. >>>> >>>> Thanks. >>>> >>>> Doug Hill >> > _______________________________________________ swift-users mailing list swift-users@swift.org https://lists.swift.org/mailman/listinfo/swift-users
