On 26.04.2017 17:01, J.E. Schotsman via swift-users wrote:
On 26 Apr 2017, at 16:54, Rien <r...@balancingrock.nl> wrote:
Agree, though the function should probably be named something like: withEach
instead of forEach.
Maybe worth a proposal on evolution?
Let’s wait until the people at the other side of the big lake have had time to
react.
There have been requests for something like this on swift-evolution,
e.g. here in the context of the discussion about a `reduce` variant that
takes `inout` arguments:
https://lists.swift.org/pipermail/swift-evolution/Week-of-Mon-20170123/030641.html
An alternative might be to add a variant of `map` to `MutableCollection`
that mutates the collection directly, see:
https://lists.swift.org/pipermail/swift-evolution/Week-of-Mon-20170123/030643.html.
But as far as I know there hasn't been a proposal for adding this. (Is
it important enough to have in the standard library? I don't know.)
_______________________________________________
swift-users mailing list
swift-users@swift.org
https://lists.swift.org/mailman/listinfo/swift-users
