> On Apr 27, 2017, at 01:48 , Alex Blewitt <alb...@apple.com> wrote:
>
...
> The let constant may not even be stored in a single place; if it's known to
> be constant it can be in-lined at the point of use and potentially unpacked
> and dead code elimination throw away the unused members, for example.
>
> If you want to pass in a let constant into the pointer, you can create a copy
> of it locally in a local variable and then use that instead. However this
> will be in the local scope, so the pointer isn't valid after it returns.
Ah, so this brings up another issue, then. Many of the calls in the C library
take a pointer to some memory and hang on to it, filling it in at a later point
(they make network requests). I've been doing it like this, and it's been
working, but I wonder if this is fragile:
class
MyClass
{
func
execute()
{
self.dataBuffer = Data(count: kLGSImageDataSize)
precondition(self.dataBuffer != nil, "Unable to allocate image buffer
(\(kLGSImageDataSize) bytes)")
var params = c_library_params_t()
params.data_capacity = self.dataBuffer!.count
self.dataBuffer?.withUnsafeMutableBytes
{ (inBuffer) -> Void in
// This call returns immediately, but assumes
// it can write to inBuffer later…
self.request = c_library_call(¶ms, inBuffer)
}
if self.request == nil
{
// Error
}
}
var dataBuffer: Data?
}
--
Rick Mann
rm...@latencyzero.com
_______________________________________________
swift-users mailing list
swift-users@swift.org
https://lists.swift.org/mailman/listinfo/swift-users
