Lars, et al, This is an interesting thread. I'd like to call your attention to a group that is taking IBIS to the Web under the rubrics: global sensemaking and hypermedia discourse. An entry point is
http://www.globalsensemaking.net/ The notion of applying a speech act ontology to model "moves" in recorded (modeled) dialogues is an interesting one. I'm not sure I see that as "far more important" than (I presume) the IBIS ontology; that might be the key question in an IBIS discussion: "Which is a more valuable ontology: IBIS or Speech Acts in the context of recording (facilitating) a dialogue?" There might even be a better way to open such a dialogue; after all, sensemaking is often about finding the best question(s) to ask. The Compendium Insitutute found at http://compendiuim.open.ac.uk/institute/ is formed around such matters. Indeed, the Compendium (free, Java) dialogue mapping tool uses a simple IBIS ontology; it would be valuable to engage people such as Jeff Conklin and Simon Buckingham Shum in a dialogue based on the suggestion made here. I suspect that, while I would like to contest the assertion that speech act models are more important than are IBIS models in the context of hypermedia discourse, the assertion is nevertheless an important contribution to the field. Cheers, Jack L. Ludwig wrote: > Well, > > In ArtificialMemory, I have implemented an Issue-base Information System > (http://www.artificialmemory.net/artificialmemory.aspx?ID=17888VT) ontology > some years ago. But, by now, I think that in order to represent a discussion > it is far more important to have a speech act ontology and to support the > individually consistent expression of real and unreal statements. Besides > others. > > :-) Lars Ludwig > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > // Message: 1 > // Date: Mon, 14 Jul 2008 18:31:49 +0100 > // From: Christoph LANGE <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > // Subject: [swikig] Cicero [Re: Argumentative (= semantic) discussions > // now in IkeWiki and SWiM] > // To: [email protected] > // Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > // Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" > // > // Dear semantic wiki community, > // > // about one month ago I announced the implementation of argumentative > // discussions using the DILIGENT argumentation ontology in IkeWiki on this > list. > // So far I thought that, besides the system presented in ? > // > // > C. Tempich, E. Simperl, M. Luczak, R. Studer, and H. S. Pinto. > // > Argumentation- based ontology engineering. IEEE Intelligent Systems, > // > 22(6):52?59, 2007. > _______________________________________________ swikig mailing list [email protected] http://www.aifb.uni-karlsruhe.de/mailman/listinfo/swikig
