Hi all, I'm replying a bit late, but that gives me the advantage to comment on more than one previous mail ;-)
First of all, I added another "feature" on semanticweb.org, namely the mechanism for annotations (manual vs. automatic). Please have a look at that to see whether it makes sense for your wikis. I'm not so sure whether I covered all possible values; I think there are more: http://semanticweb.org/wiki/Property:SWikiFeat:AnnotationMechanism From a technical point of view, and considering Axel's mail, it may also be interesting to document whether RDF is the native storage format of the wiki (as it is, e.g., in Axel's case), or whether it is extracted from the actual page format upon saving a page (as, e.g., in my case, or in SMW). I added that to http://semanticweb.org/wiki/Semantic_Wiki_Features @Tobias: I agree with you that the conceptual level of semantics (domain level vs. meta level) is an important distinction. @Daniel: I support your proposal to put your list of evaluation criteria into the wiki; that would be really helpful. I found "transparent content storage" an interesting point. Is this actually supported by any semantic wiki? In SWiM I have a half-done Subversion backend, but it is not yet really transparently integrated. -- However, as Markus pointed out, this is probably not too relevant for our discussion, as it does not matter for the user. Unless one supported storage backend is a semantic one, and the user can get more features from accessing that storage with _other_ semantic frontends. Cheers, Christoph -- Christoph Lange, Jacobs Univ. Bremen, http://kwarc.info/clange, Skype duke4701
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
_______________________________________________ swikig mailing list [email protected] http://www.aifb.uni-karlsruhe.de/mailman/listinfo/swikig
