El 18/12/09 13:59, Pavel Porvatov escribió: > Hi Ricardo, >> In the example I attached in the previous thread: >> - Generified editable combobox was supported *if* the generic class >> had a constructor: new XXX(String s). It is easy to modify it to >> accept an empty contructor plus a setter method setName(String s) or >> whatever > It looks too tricky to use such generification. Just imagine if the > java.util.List class was generified in the same way.... > You are right, it works but is a bit tricky, so probably is valid for a library, but not for the core java.
> See my example above. Try to implement the same functionality with > your generification and you'll see that it's harder to done. > I see your point. I have no objection to it -- Ricardo
