Guys, could you please take a look at this simple one-line fix? One more 
reviewer is needed.

Thanks,
Leonid.


On Oct 1, 2013, at 7:29 PM, Leonid Romanov <[email protected]> wrote:

> Hello,
> I've modified the test to allow it to run with others l&f. Also, I've added 
> the check for null icon.
> 
> http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~leonidr/8016551/webrev.01/ 
> <http://cr.openjdk.java.net/%7Eleonidr/8016551/webrev.01/>
> 
> 
> On 9/25/2013 16:37, Sergey Bylokhov wrote:
>> On 25.09.2013 16:32, Leonid Romanov wrote:
>>> On 9/25/2013 16:09, Sergey Bylokhov wrote:
>>>> On 25.09.2013 15:49, Leonid Romanov wrote:
>>>>> I'm not sure whether UIManager.getIcon("InternalFrame.closeIcon") is 
>>>>> guaranteed to return non null with other look&feels.
>>>> I am not sure it is guaranteed  to wl&f as well.  I don't see specific to 
>>>> windows code.
>>> 
>>> com.sun.java.swing.plaf.windows.WindowsLookAndFeel has the following line 
>>> in initComponentDefaults() method:
>>> "InternalFrame.closeIcon", WindowsIconFactory.createFrameCloseIcon()
>>> 
>>> So I think we can be sure about wl&f.
>> The same code exists in aqua, metal etc. But it can be null or can be 
>> changed to null in future.
>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> On Sep 25, 2013, at 1:55 AM, Sergey Bylokhov <[email protected]> 
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>> 
>>>>>> Hi, Leonid.
>>>>>> Is the test not applicable for default l&f if WindowsLookAndFeel is not 
>>>>>> exists?
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> On 25.09.2013 1:29, Leonid Romanov wrote:
>>>>>>> Hello,
>>>>>>> Please review a one line fix for 8016551: JMenuItem in 
>>>>>>> WindowsLookAndFeel can't paint default icons. I'm not sure whether such 
>>>>>>> a trivial change needs a regression test, but I've written one anyway, 
>>>>>>> just in case. If it's not needed, I won't commit it.
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8016551
>>>>>>> webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~leonidr/8016551/webrev.00/ 
>>>>>>> <http://cr.openjdk.java.net/%7Eleonidr/8016551/webrev.00/>
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>>> Leonid.
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> -- 
>>>>>> Best regards, Sergey.
>>>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>> 
>> 
>> 
> 

Reply via email to