Hi Krishna,
Changes are fine.
Thanks,
Jay
*From:*Krishna Addepalli
*Sent:* Wednesday, January 10, 2018 8:17 PM
*To:* Jayathirth D V; swing-dev@openjdk.java.net
*Subject:* RE: <Swing Dev> [10][11][JDK-8194044] Regression manual
Test javax/swing/JFileChooser/8067660/FileChooserTest.java fails
Hi Jay,
Thanks for the suggestions, and I have created a new webrev here:
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~kaddepalli/8194044/webrev03/
<http://cr.openjdk.java.net/%7Ekaddepalli/8194044/webrev03/>
However, I don’t think Test if is a typo. It can be read as is and
still makes sense.
Regards,
Krishna
*From:*Jayathirth D V
*Sent:* Wednesday, January 10, 2018 6:18 PM
*To:* Krishna Addepalli <krishna.addepa...@oracle.com
<mailto:krishna.addepa...@oracle.com>>; swing-dev@openjdk.java.net
<mailto:swing-dev@openjdk.java.net>
*Subject:* RE: <Swing Dev> [10][11][JDK-8194044] Regression manual
Test javax/swing/JFileChooser/8067660/FileChooserTest.java fails
Hi Krishna,
Please find my inputs:
1)There is no need for Starting and Ending year in copyright of test
case as it is a new file. Adding just 2018 would be enough.
2)Typo in jtreg summary : “Test if” it should be “Tests if”.
3)For multiline comments using /*..*/, First line should be left
empty in a block comment at Line no 24 & 42 and last line of block
comment should have proper indentation at Line no 30. Java coding
convention for comments :
http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/java/codeconventions-141999.html
Thanks,
Jay
*From:*Krishna Addepalli
*Sent:* Wednesday, January 10, 2018 6:00 PM
*To:* Jayathirth D V; swing-dev@openjdk.java.net
<mailto:swing-dev@openjdk.java.net>
*Subject:* RE: <Swing Dev> [10][11][JDK-8194044] Regression manual
Test javax/swing/JFileChooser/8067660/FileChooserTest.java fails
Hi Jay,
Thanks for your time and review. I have incorporated your review
comments and created a new webrev here:
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~kaddepalli/8194044/webrev02/
<http://cr.openjdk.java.net/%7Ekaddepalli/8194044/webrev02/>
Thanks,
Krishna
*From:*Jayathirth D V
*Sent:* Wednesday, January 10, 2018 4:16 PM
*To:* Krishna Addepalli <krishna.addepa...@oracle.com
<mailto:krishna.addepa...@oracle.com>>; swing-dev@openjdk.java.net
<mailto:swing-dev@openjdk.java.net>
*Subject:* RE: <Swing Dev> [10][11][JDK-8194044] Regression manual
Test javax/swing/JFileChooser/8067660/FileChooserTest.java fails
Hi Krishna,
Please find my inputs:
Test case needs to be updated with minor changes:
1)Copyright information needs to be added at the start of test file.
2)Jtreg test summary needs to be updated to mention what the test is
trying to achieve instead of JBS bug title.
3)Also since this test is specific to Windows we can remove the OS
test code present in test case with Jtreg @requires flag:
Instead of using the below code we can use @requires (os.family ==
"windows")
if (OSInfo.getOSType() != OSInfo.OSType.WINDOWS) {
System.out.println("The test is suitable only for Windows OS. Skipped.");
return;
}
4)For multiline comments at Line no 1 & 26 in test case please update
the comment syntax to use :
/*
*
*
*/
Thanks,
Jay
*From:*Krishna Addepalli
*Sent:* Tuesday, January 09, 2018 2:30 PM
*To:* Prasanta Sadhukhan; swing-dev@openjdk.java.net
<mailto:swing-dev@openjdk.java.net>
*Subject:* Re: <Swing Dev> [10][11][JDK-8194044] Regression manual
Test javax/swing/JFileChooser/8067660/FileChooserTest.java fails
Hi Prasanta,Sergey,
I have added a testcase along with the changes and created a new
webrev : http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~kaddepalli/8194044/webrev01/
<http://cr.openjdk.java.net/%7Ekaddepalli/8194044/webrev01/>
Please review this and provide your comments.
Thanks,
Krishna
*From:*Prasanta Sadhukhan
*Sent:* Thursday, January 4, 2018 10:54 AM
*To:* Krishna Addepalli <krishna.addepa...@oracle.com
<mailto:krishna.addepa...@oracle.com>>; swing-dev@openjdk.java.net
<mailto:swing-dev@openjdk.java.net>
*Subject:* Re: <Swing Dev> [10][11][JDK-8194044] Regression manual
Test javax/swing/JFileChooser/8067660/FileChooserTest.java fails
A regression test is added to prove that before your fix, java was
failing and after your fix is applied, it is passing so it is not
related to older/newer java versions. I saw we already have
test/jdk/javax/swing/JFileChooser/6945316/bug6945316.java which tests
isFileSystemRoot. Maybe, we can do something similar if it's not too
much of a task.
Regards
Prasanta
On 1/3/2018 5:13 PM, Krishna Addepalli wrote:
Thanks for the review Prasanta. However, I don’t see a point to
write a test case for isFileSystemRoot(), since, it is not going
to fail on any (older/newer) java versions, and it was only
introduced because of the fix for JDK-8175015.
Let me know if you think otherwise.
Regards,
Krishna
*From:*Prasanta Sadhukhan
*Sent:* Wednesday, January 3, 2018 11:27 AM
*To:* Krishna Addepalli <krishna.addepa...@oracle.com>
<mailto:krishna.addepa...@oracle.com>; swing-dev@openjdk.java.net
<mailto:swing-dev@openjdk.java.net>
*Subject:* Re: <Swing Dev> [10][11][JDK-8194044] Regression manual
Test javax/swing/JFileChooser/8067660/FileChooserTest.java fails
Fix looks fine. But I guess, it is possible to add a automated
regression test to it utilising isFileSystemRoot().
Regards
Prasanta
On 1/2/2018 4:31 PM, Krishna Addepalli wrote:
Hi All,
Please review a fix for bug:
Bug: JDK-8194044 :
https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8194044
Webrev:
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~kaddepalli/8194044/webrev00/
<http://cr.openjdk.java.net/%7Ekaddepalli/8194044/webrev00/>
This was caused due to the fix for JDK-8175015, in which the
line 446 in Win32ShellFolderManager2.java was changed from
“getDrives()” to Win32ShellFolder2.listRoots().
While the earlier function returns an object of
Win32ShellFolder2, the latter returns an array of Files.
The condition on line 450: “return
(sf.isFileSystem()&&sf.parent != null &&
sf.parent.equals(Win32ShellFolder2.listRoots())” was returning
false because of the wrong object being passed. Earlier it was
a Win32ShellFolder2 object, and the comparision was done
properly, but with the changes, the equals fucnction was
receiving a file array object, and hence it was immediately
returning false, leading to the problem of empty strings being
shown for Root drives.
The fix is to replace “Win32ShellFolder2.listRoots()” with
“getDrives()” function. With this fix, the regression is
addressed, as well as the original JDK-8175015 which was a
memory leak issue.
Thanks,
Krishna