On 13/08/2018 19:32, Krishna Addepalli wrote:
I understand that with the new jep, we no longer need to explicitly write the
constructor to avoid the synthetic accessor methods generated by the compiler.
AFAIK, each inner class declared results in a class file being generated
rather than each default constructor. Could you clarify this a bit more?
You can compile this example by jdk8 and jdk11:
public final class InheritTest {
Object createInnerClass() {
return new InnerClass();
}
private final class InnerClass { // change access here.
}
}
On jdk8 three classfiles will be created, and only two on jdk11. If you
change the type to default/protected then two files will be created on
jdk8 as well. This is why the classes in the fix have such constructors.
I also have another question: In general, is it better to provide a manual
method to avoid the generation of synthetic accessor methods? In the context of
this code change, I fail to see how it would have helped by writing explicit
method rather than letting the compiler generate an accessor method.
In the context of this change it is not necessary to have any tricks to
avoid synthetic methods, which were created by javac to solve "access"
problem. Because this problem was fixed by JEP 181.
--
Best regards, Sergey.
