Hi Phil, It looks like JDK_BUILD_ID is no more set. Here is the code: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/verona/stage/rev/4999895b3a44#l2.7. So mostly the XSTR() function returns the string itself if no value is set.
Here is the updated Webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~sveerabhadra/8190361/webrev.02/ Thanks and regards, Shashi From: Philip Race Sent: Wednesday, February 13, 2019 11:24 PM To: Shashidhara Veerabhadraiah <[email protected]> Cc: swing-dev <[email protected]> Subject: Re: <Swing Dev> [13] JDK-8190361: Incorrect version info in jaccessinspector.exe and jaccesswalker.exe I'd prefer to see the webrev updated since it is the only line changed :-) But part of my confusion is I don't understand why JDK_VERSION_STRING will be evaluated but JDK_BUILD_ID will be copied literally - rather than using its value ? -phil. On 2/11/19, 12:28 AM, Shashidhara Veerabhadraiah wrote: Hi Phil, The version string "JDK_VERSION_STRING" is the one that was brought in as part of the implementation of the JEP: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8085822 In this they introduced a change in the name of the version string and here is that change: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/verona/stage/rev/4999895b3a44#l2.8 I think it was missed out change as part of the implementation of that JEP for version string name change. I have added the same info as a confidential comment to the bug. I edited the file on the visual studio with just a replacing the text and I think it has inserted unnecessary indentations. I will modify that while pushing in if it is ok with you(if that's the only change). Thanks and regards, Shashi From: Phil Race Sent: Friday, February 8, 2019 10:28 PM To: Shashidhara Veerabhadraiah HYPERLINK "mailto:[email protected]"<[email protected]>; swing-dev HYPERLINK "mailto:[email protected]"<[email protected]> Subject: Re: <Swing Dev> [13] JDK-8190361: Incorrect version info in jaccessinspector.exe and jaccesswalker.exe So yes .. it changes that .. but could you explain why the new string is correct ? I don't see an evaluation here, or in the bug report - where there should be one! Also the indentation seems wrong - even when I look at the "raw" file. -phil. On 2/8/19 1:07 AM, Shashidhara Veerabhadraiah wrote: Hi All, Please review a fix for the below customer bug. Bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8190361 Webrev: HYPERLINK "http://cr.openjdk.java.net/%7Esveerabhadra/8190361/webrev.01/"http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~sveerabhadra/8190361/webrev.01/ The version string for the jaccessinspector and jaccesswalker modules had the string "JDK_BUILD_ID" and this change fixes that. The only doubt I had is that, hopefully these resource files are not generated from a different file and is editable by manual way. Thanks and regards, Shashi
