Hi Krishna,
On 04-Mar-19 5:49 PM, Krishna Addepalli wrote:
Hi Prasanta,
Yes, you are right. But, does it make a difference if we still update
the values even if they are same?
I am not pointing to
d.width = newWidth; My concern is newState |= (WIDTH_FLAG |
HEIGHT_FLAG);where you update the state even if width/height can be 0. I
am not sure about possible repurcussions? I do not see any test with
image of width/height=0 so thought that you probably do not check that
path. Regards Prasanta
Thanks,
Krishna
On 04-Mar-2019, at 5:12 PM, Prasanta Sadhukhan
<prasanta.sadhuk...@oracle.com
<mailto:prasanta.sadhuk...@oracle.com>> wrote:
On 04-Mar-19 4:53 PM, Krishna Addepalli wrote:
Hi Prasanta,
Thanks for the review. Here is the updated webrev:
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~kaddepalli/8218674/webrev01/
<http://cr.openjdk.java.net/%7Ekaddepalli/8218674/webrev01/>
The check (newWidth>0) && (newHeight > 0) is done in
adjustWidthHeight function.
if (specifiedWidth != -1 && specifiedHeight != -1) {915 newWidth =
specifiedWidth;916 newHeight = specifiedHeight;917 } ... 931 d.width
= newWidth;932 d.height = newHeight;If specifiedWidth/Height is 0,
then I do not see any check, it is just assigning to d.width/height,
no? In that case, can we need to change the newstate without
checking? Regards Prasanta
Thanks,
Krishna
On 04-Mar-2019, at 1:29 PM, Prasanta Sadhukhan
<prasanta.sadhuk...@oracle.com
<mailto:prasanta.sadhuk...@oracle.com>> wrote:
Hi Krishna,
You can reuse existing method getLoadsSynchronously() instead of
checking for (state & SYNC_LOAD_FLAG) != 0)
BTW, do we not have to check if (newWidth > 0) & newHeight >0
before changing the newstate @l797? The copyright year in testcase
should be changed to 2019. Regards Prasanta
On 01-Mar-19 12:10 PM, Krishna Addepalli wrote:
Thanks for the review Sergey.
Can I have one more review? Prasanta maybe?
Thanks,
Krishna
On 01-Mar-2019, at 3:40 AM, Sergey Bylokhov<sergey.bylok...@oracle.com> wrote:
Looks fine.
On 21/02/2019 08:44, Sergey Bylokhov wrote:
On 20/02/2019 22:21, Krishna Addepalli wrote:
Hi Sergey,
I have fixed the issue. Could you check now?
Yes, it works now, I look to the fix.
Thanks,
Krishna
-----Original Message-----
From: Sergey Bylokhov
Sent: Thursday, February 21, 2019 3:54 AM
To: Krishna Addepalli<krishna.addepa...@oracle.com>;swing-dev@openjdk.java.net
Subject: Re: <Swing Dev> [13] RFR: JDK-8218674 - HTML Tooltip with "img=src" on
component doesn't show
Hi, Krishna.
Some links have wrong file permissions, "403 - Forbidden":
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~kaddepalli/8218674/webrev00/raw_files/new/test/jdk/javax/swing/text/html/8218674/circle.png
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~kaddepalli/8218674/webrev00/raw_files/new/test/jdk/javax/swing/text/html/8218674/TooltipImageTest.java
On 20/02/2019 03:57, Krishna Addepalli wrote:
Hi All,
Please review a fix for the bug
JDK-8218674:https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8218674
Webrev:http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~kaddepalli/8218674/webrev00/
This is a regression introduced due to fix for JDK-8208638. The default
behaviour for ImageView is to load an image asynchronously. Hence, it uses the
ImageHandler::imageUpdate to get the updates to the image being loaded. That
will set the width and height of the image view. ImageView::updateImageSize
does not alter the width and height in this case. When a JToolTip is created
and html text set as tooltip, internally, the image is requested to be loaded
synchronously, and in this case, ImageView::updateImageSize is the only way to
calculate the image size. Since the width and height were not specified in the
tooltip, the image was not being drawn.
The fix is to check if the image is requested to be loaded synchronously, and
if so, then do the same calculation as for the fix for JDK-8208638, which will
provide valid image width and height, additionally also taking care of the
scaling issues fixed for JDK-8208638.
I have tested the fix on Windows, Linux(Ubuntu) and Mac, and found that it is
working. I have also run all the jtreg tests under the
test/jdk/javax/swing/text/html, and found no new failures.
Thanks,
Krishna
--
Best regards, Sergey.