I guess since it is mentioned in the coding guidelines, we should follow
that. We should try changing the event package and others, if time
permits to match coding guidelines.
But having said that, I am open to follow whatever you leads decide.
Regards
Prasanta
On 05-Aug-20 8:17 AM, Sergey Bylokhov wrote:
On 04.08.2020 14:05, Philip Race wrote:
Section 6.4 of the 23 year old coding guidelines
https://www.oracle.com/technetwork/java/codeconventions-150003.pdf
appear to suggest {} for empty methods.
However I know this only because I went to look.
I would have guessed the opposite .. and prefer that opposite.
On the other side lots of classes in the client-libs(for example in
the "java.awt.event" package) use such style:
https://github.com/openjdk/jdk/blob/master/src/java.desktop/share/classes/java/awt/event/ComponentAdapter.java
https://github.com/openjdk/jdk/blob/master/src/java.desktop/share/classes/java/awt/event/ContainerAdapter.java
https://github.com/openjdk/jdk/blob/master/src/java.desktop/share/classes/java/awt/event/KeyAdapter.java
etc.
So maybe this is a common practice
