On Wed, 9 Sep 2020 05:40:30 GMT, Prasanta Sadhukhan <psadhuk...@openjdk.org> wrote:
>> Please review a fix for issue where it was seen that several >> nested classes rely on default constructors as part of their public API. >> >> It's to be noted that "A no-arg public constructor is generated by the >> compiler for a class if it does not declare an >> explicit constructor. While convenient, this is inappropriate for many kinds >> of formal classes, both because the >> constructor will have no javadoc and because the constructor may be >> unintended." For the JDK, classes intended to be >> used outside of the JDK, public classes in exported packages, should not >> rely on default constructors. >> Proposed fix is to add explicit public no-arg constructors for public >> classes and protected no-arg constructor for >> public abstract classes for javax.swing module (as one part of overalll >> java.desktop change) >> CSR: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8252908 > > Prasanta Sadhukhan has updated the pull request incrementally with one > additional commit since the last revision: > > Modify access modifier to protected for protected classes Marked as reviewed by prr (Reviewer). ------------- PR: https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk/pull/72
