On Mon, 26 Oct 2020 17:59:50 GMT, Phil Race <p...@openjdk.org> wrote:
>> test/jdk/ProblemList.txt line 906: >> >>> 904: >>> java/awt/event/MouseEvent/AltGraphModifierTest/AltGraphModifierTest.java >>> 8162380 generic-all >>> 905: java/awt/Window/TranslucentJAppletTest/TranslucentJAppletTest.java >>> 8163086 macosx-all >>> 906: java/awt/image/multiresolution/MultiResolutionIcon/IconTest.java >>> 8250804 macosx-all,linux-all >> >> I still think that the sort based on test names is better, but if the >> current list is sorted by the bugid then the JDK-8250804 is out of order. > > That's because is *was* under > https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8163285 but that got closed as a dup > of 8250804 .. which seems backwards to me as the new one is usually the dup. > But in any case I am not going to lose any sleep over this one anomaly that > it caused. That's why I said it is a bad idea to sort using the bugid, since it is impossible to mantains this even in one review request. ------------- PR: https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk/pull/846
