On Mon, 15 Mar 2021 21:35:23 GMT, Alexey Ivanov <aiva...@openjdk.org> wrote:
>> But probably it might be changed in the future? If for example, we will move >> some common functionality from the standard subclasses to this method. > > It hasn't changed over all these years… In addition to that, the > specification says you *must* override and shows the example without calling > `super.updateUI()`. > My take is it's unlikely to change. Yet I understand your concern: Stating > explicitly `JComponent.updateUI` is empty means there's no way back. So being > cautious wouldn't hurt. From this point of view, `@implnote` still gives some > flexibility rather than being cast in stone. `@implnote` added ------------- PR: https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk/pull/2955
